Also read: Umar Khalid amplified narrative using actors, politicians, portals: Delhi police
Umar Khalid had moved the local court after withdrawing his plea from the Supreme Court in February.
"Is sharing messages a criminal or terror act?" his lawyer had said in the court.
The Special public prosecutor (SPP) had alleged that Umar Khalid was amplifying his narrative as part of a conspiracy by sharing certain links.
To this, Khalid's lawyer responded by saying that the latter was sharing the "correct narrative".
Earlier, his lawyer had argued that Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha, who were granted bail by the Delhi high court, were accused of similar offenses.
The Special Public Prosecutor submitted that several people took to X (earlier Twitter) to influence Umar Khalid's bail hearing.
Opposing Khalid's bail, the public prosecutor said: “WhatsApp chats also revealed that he is in the habit of creating media and social media narratives at the time of listing bail applications of the person booked in cases to clearly influence bail hearings.”
He referred to tweets by activists and journalists like Teesta Seetalvad, Aakar Patel, Kaushik Raj, Swati Chaturvedi, Arju Ahmed and others.
He dismissed Khalid's lawyer's claim of the latter being subjected to a media trial. He accused Khalid of playing around with the media.